The Definitive Guide to immigration law case management system
The Definitive Guide to immigration law case management system
Blog Article
“There is no ocular evidence to show that Muhammad Abbas was murdered by any with the present petitioners. Mere fact that Noor Muhammad and Muhammad Din observed firstly the deceased and after a ways they observed the petitioners going towards the same direction, did not mean that the petitioners were chasing the deceased or were accompanying him. These kinds of evidence cannot be treated as evidence of very last seen.
The focus is to the intention to cause injury. This is actually a major problem: a very reduced threshold for an offence carrying the death penalty.
four. Record shows that the petitioner is booked in as much as 8 criminal cases under the same offence with different complainants and involving sizable amounts of money. These cases span over the years 2018 to 2020 and three cases have been registered after the registration of the instant case. While the petitioner has obtained bail in All those cases, it does, prima facie, set up that the petitioner is vulnerable to repeating the offence.
The convictions and sentences Upheld, as misappropriation was committed during the bank and because only the appellants were posted on the relevant time .(Criminal Appeal )
Now it is properly-settled that considerations for pre-arrest and post-arrest bail are thoroughly different, therefore, inside our view the figured out Judge experienced fallen in error to cancel the bail allowed to petitioner because of the same Additional Sessions Judge.”
This Court might interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer within a manner inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the mode of inquiry or where the summary or finding arrived at via the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. Should the summary or finding is which include no reasonable person would have ever achieved, the Court may possibly interfere with the summary or even the finding and mold the relief to really make it appropriate towards the facts of every case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority may be the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-recognize the evidence or maybe the nature of punishment. About the aforesaid proposition, we're fortified from the decision from the Supreme Court within the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Read more
148 . Const. P. 8180/2019 (D.B.) Saif Shujaat and Ors V/S Govt. of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Supplied the legal analysis on the subject issue, we're in the view that the claim of the petitioners for retroactive regularization from their First contract appointment and promotion thereon, from that angle is not legally seem, Other than promotion and seniority, not absolute rights, They are really subject matter to rules and regulations Should the recruitment rules of the topic post allow the case with the petitioners for promotion might be regarded as, however, we've been crystal clear within our point of view that contractual service cannot be regarded as for seniority and promotion as the seniority is reckoned from the date of normal appointment and promotion depends upon seniority cum Conditioning, subject to availability of vacancy matter on the approval from the competent authority. Read more
48 . Cr.Misc. 787/2024 (S.B.) Muhammad Anwar V/S S.P Complaint Mobile Hyderabad & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2025 SHC HYD twelve Justice in the Peace u/s 22-A isn't obliged to afford a possibility of hearing to your accused party; nor obliged to necessarily or mechanically issue directions for registration of FIR; but is necessary to look at all relevant factors, with care and caution; to avoid equipment of criminal legislation from being misused; frivolous complaints must be discouraged; relationship, enmity, transactions, litigation and other remedies, are a number of the relevant factors. Read more
This ruling has conditions, and For the reason that petitioners unsuccessful a qualifying Test, they cannot claim equity or this Court's jurisdiction based on the Niazi case analogy. nine. In view of the above mentioned facts and circumstances on the case, petitioners have not demonstrated a case for this court's intervention under Article 199 on the Constitution. Read more
If granted absolute immunity, the parties would not only be protected from liability in the matter, but could not be answerable in any way for their actions. When the court delayed making such a ruling, the defendants took their request to the appellate court.
Legal Defenses: An accused person charged under Section 302 PPC can present legal defenses like self-defense, insanity, or accidental killing, which could end in reduced charges or acquittal.
three. Rule of Legislation: The court reiterated the importance of upholding the rule of law and making sure that all institutions function within their constitutional mandates.
ninety . Const. P. 1015/2021 (D.B.) Muhammad Saleem Jehangir V/S Province of Sindh and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It is additionally important to note that neither seniority nor here promotion may be the vested right of the civil servant, therefore, neither any seniority nor any promotion may be claimed or granted without the actual length of service on account of vested rights. The purpose of prescribing a particular duration of service for getting entitled to get viewed as for promotion to some higher quality, of course, just isn't without logic given that the officer who's initially inducted to a particular post needs to serve over the claimed post to gain experience to hold the next higher post and to provide the public in the befitting manner.
dismissed as not pressed and sentences awarded to your appellant in this case is altered into imprisonment, which appellant has already undergone.(Criminal Jail Appeal )